ABHIRAM PATTNAIK v. PURNA CHANDRA MOHAPATRA, ENGINEER IN CHIEF (CIVIL) ODISHA
CONTC/6949/2024 · 2026-04-24
Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 602 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 602 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.6949 of 2024 Abhiram Pattnaik ..... Petitioner
Represented by Adv. - Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra -versus- purna chandra mohapatra, engineer in chief (civil) odisha ..... Opposite Party/Contemnor
Represented by Adv. – Mr. C.M. Singh, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
ORDER 24.04.2026
Order No.
07.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
2.
Learned counsel for the Opposite Party-Contemnor produced a copy of order dated 09.04.2026 in Court today. The same is taken on record.
3. On perusal of the said order it appears that the representation of the Petitioner which was directed to be disposed of vide order dated 10.04.2023 has been disposed of by order dated 09.04.2026 though belatedly. It is further appears that the Opposite Party-Contemnor after considering the representation of the Petitioner found that the Petitioner is not eligible to get the benefit he has claim through his representation. Since the
Page 2 of 2. representation was devoid of merit, the same has been rejected.
4. A copy of order dated 09.04.2026 be served on the learned counsel for the Petitioner.
5. In such view of the matter, the contempt proceeding is dropped with liberty to the Petitioner to approach this Court again by filing a fresh writ application in the event, the Petitioner feels aggrieved by order dated 09.04.2026.
( A.K. Mohapatra )
Judge
Sisir
Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT