HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 1022/2024 CM No. 2569/2024 Mukhtar Ahmed and others .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through :- None v/s UT of J & K & Ors. .....Respondent(s) Through :- Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R, 4 & 5. Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG for R-2, 3 & 6. Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate for R-7. CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER 11.05.2026 Learned counsel for respondent No.7 states that payments, due to the petitioners-contractors, have already been paid to them, and the instant petition has now been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioners have chosen not to appear in the case. It shows that the grievances of the petitioners might have been redressed and they have lost interest in prosecuting this petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution. (Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge JAMMU 11.05.2026 Raj Kumar Sr. No. 144 Raj Kumar 2026.05.12 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document