Sr. No. 32 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:-Crl LP (S) No. 21/2024 & CrlM No. 1014/2024 Anti Corruption Bureau …. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through:- Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG V/s Ramesh Chander …..Respondent(s) Through:- Mr. M. Gautam, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 06.02.2026 CrlM No. 1014/2024 Learned counsel for the respondent submits that objections have been filed, however, the same are defective. On the other hand, learned counsel for the appellant contends that the impugned judgment suffers from various legal as well as factual lacunae and that all requisite steps for filing the appeal have been taken, including the filing of an application for condonation of delay. For the reason enumerated therein, a sufficient case for condonation of delay is made out. Accordingly, the delay in filing appeal is condoned. Crl LP(S) No. 21/2024 After hearing learned counsel for the parties for a while, a case for grant of leave to appeal is also made out. Leave to appeal is granted. Disposed of. Registry to register the appeal. Admit the appeal to hearing. Crl LP (S) No. 21/2024 & CrlM No. 1014/2024 Post-admission notice is waived of. List for final hearing on 02.04.2026. ( SANJAY PARIHAR ) JUDGE JAMMU 06.02.2026 Nikhil