Sr. No. 42 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:-CRM (M) No. 977/2024 & connected CrlM Mohd. Afzal Beigh …. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through:- None V/s Gul-E-Surkhab …..Respondent(s) Through:- Mr. Sumir Pandita, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 06.02.2026 There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing i.e. on 21.05.2025. Even today, when the matter was taken up, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner is regularly appearing before the Trial Court and is not interested in appearing before this Court. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the instant petition. Accordingly, the petition along with connected application(s), is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. ( SANJAY PARIHAR ) JUDGE JAMMU 06.02.2026 Nikhil