Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2024 DAILYLAW 549 (JK)

SHAMAS UD DIN MALIK v. UT OF J AND K TH. SECRETARY YOUTH SERVICES AND SPORTS DEPARTMENT JAMMU AND OTHERS

WP(C)/1579/2024 · 2026-02-09

Sanjay Dhar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP(C) No.1579/2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No.1579/2024 Date of pronouncement : 09.02.2025 Uploaded on : 10.02.2026 Shamas Ud Din Malik ….Petitioners Through:- Mr. Anuj Dewan Raina, Advocate V/s UT of J&K & Ors. …..Respondents Through:- Ms. Anshuja Tak, Advocate \ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE JUDGMENT (ORAL) - 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, with the change in the circumstances, the petitioner is not aggrieved of the impugned transfer order dated 25.06.2024 and to this extent, he does not want to pursue this writ petition. His statement is taken on record. 2. The learned counsel further submits that by virtue of the impugned order dated 03.07.2024, he has been placed under suspension but now he has joined the new place of posting and he is being paid full salary. Serial No. 113 Regular List WP(C) No.1579/2024 3. A perusal of the impugned suspension order would reveal that the cause for placing the petitioner under suspension had arisen on account of non-joining of petitioner pursuant to the impugned transfer order dated 25.06.2024. Now that the petitioner has joined his new place of posting as indicated in order dated 25.06.2024, the reason for placing him under suspension does not survive. 4. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to review the impugned suspension order dated 03.07.2024, in the light of petitioner’s withdrawal of the challenge to the transfer order dated 25.06.2024 and his joining of new place of working. 5. The petitioner shall be at liberty to approach this Court afresh, in case the cause survives. (SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU 09.02.2026 Sneha Whether the judgment is speaking: Yes/No Whether the judgment is reportable: Yes/No