IRFAN ABDULLAH YATOO v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME DEPARTMENT)
HCP/261/2024 · 2026-04-30
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 545 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 545 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 12 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
HCP 261/2024 CM (4267/2024) Irfan Abdullah Yatoo. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. H. Furrahi, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Furqan Yaqub Sofi, GA.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 30.04.2026
01. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the efflux of time, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous, inasmuch as the order of detention bearing No. 14/DMP/PSA/24 dated 01.02.2024 has already outlived its life and the petitioner has also been released from custody.
02. Mr. Furqan Yaqub Sofi, learned Government Advocate, fairly submits that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous with the efflux of time.
03. In view of the fact that the period of detention has already expired and the petitioner stands released from custody, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAGAR: 30.04.2026
“HAMID”