IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CMP(M) No. 1685 of 2024 Decided on: 27.02.2026 ____________________________________________________ Union of India ……….. petitioners Versus Teju and another ……….respondents ____________________________________________________ Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner : Mr. V.B . Verma, Central Government Counsel. For the respondents : Mr. Gobind Korla, Additional Advocate General for respondent No.2. ____________________________________________________ Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral) In pursuance to the previous order, steps for service of respondent No.1 have not been taken. The previous order reads as follow:- “Time for effecting service upon respondent No.1 is being sought since 14.11.2024. However, till date steps have not been taken. Let the needful be done within a week. It is made clear that if the steps are not taken within the said period, then the matter shall be dismissed for non prosecution. In case steps are taken within a week, then let notice be issued to respondent No.1, returnable within four weeks”. 2. Since no steps have been taken for service of respondent No.1, therefore, the application is dismissed for non- prosecution. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 27th February,2026 tarun 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?