Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 5166 (MAD)

G.Rajagopal, v. Thiru. Kumarakuruparan, I.A.S.,

CONT P/2836/2024 · 2026-08-13

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.No.2836 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.08.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Cont.P.No.2836 of 2024 G.Rajagopal, S/o.Govindasamy, B.Ed Middle Shool Headmaster (Retired), Tiruchengode Road, Namakkal 637 001. Petitioner Vs 1.Kumarakuruparan, I.A.S., Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.S.Sethuramavarma, The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai-600 006. 3.A. Balasubramanian, District Educational Officer, (Elementary) (Redesignated from the post of District Elementary Educational Officer) Namakkal District, Namakkal. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.2836 of 2024 4.S.Chandiravathana, Block Educational Officer, (Formerly known as The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer) Erumaipatti Panchayat Union, Erumaipatti, Namakkal District. Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order in W.P.No.5302 of 2017, dated 28.04.2019. For Petitioner: Mr.R.Saseetharan For Respondents: Mr.S.Ganesh Babu Govt. Advocate ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.Arul Murugan,J.) This contempt petition has been filed alleging disobedience of the order dated 28.04.2019 passed in W.P.No.5302 of 2017. 2. The respondents have filed compliance affidavit, wherein it is stated that, in compliance with the order, they have already issued proceedings dated 4.8.2026, where the computation has been done ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.2836 of 2024 and the order of this Court has been duly complied with. 3. In view of the fact that the order of this Court has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this contempt petition and the same is, accordingly, closed. However, we leave it open to the petitioner to approach the authorities, if any grievance still subsists. No costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 13.08.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.2836 of 2024 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. bbr Cont.P.No.2836 of 2024 13.08.2026 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis