Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 5130 (MAD)

The Managing Director v. The Presiding Officer

CMP(MD)/5999/2024 · 2026-08-19

C V Karthikeyan, R Sakthivel

Transfer Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP(MD)No.5999 of 2024 in WA(MD)SR.No.18670 of 2024 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. and R. SAKTHIVEL, J. This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 355 days in filing the Writ Appeal. 2. In the affidavit filed in support of this petition, it is stated that owing to administrative reasons the delay had occurred. 3. Notice had been directed and notice was served. The learned counsel entered appearance for the respondents. 4. Taking the above stated facts into consideration, the delay stands condoned and this petition is allowed. The Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise in order. When the matter is listed for admission, the name of the learned counsel, who appeared for the respondents, shall be printed in the cause list. (C.V.K., J) & (R.S.V., J) bala 19.08.2026 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. and R. SAKTHIVEL, J. bala CMP(MD)No.5999 of 2024 in WA(MD)SR.No.18670 of 2024 19.08.2026 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis