YOUNIS AHMAD WANI v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME DEPARTMENT)
HCP/209/2024 · 2026-04-23
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 505 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 505 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
HCP 209/2024.
YOUNIS AHMAD WANI.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: None. VERSUS
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS.
…Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Furqan Sofi, GA.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 23.04.2026
01. Mr. Furqan Sofi, learned Government Advocate submits that the period of detention of the petitioner is going to expire tomorrow and the petitioner is being released tomorrow and thus, with the efflux of time, the instant petition is rendered infructuous, which is the precise reason for non-representation on behalf of the petitioner.
02. In the light of the statement made by Mr. Furqan Sofi learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents, and pursuant to the instructions received as well as the record produced before this Court, the writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that the period of detention is to come to an end tomorrow.
03. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 23.04.2026 Bisma Jan.
08 Regular