Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CONT P(MD) No. 3084 of 2024 __________ Page1 of 3 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL CONT.P(MD) No. 3084 of 2024 S.Sathish Kumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs C.Dinesh Kumar IAS., Commissioner, Madurai City Corporation, Anna Maligai, Madurai. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to initiate contempt proceedings against the Respondent and punish him for his willful disobedience in not implementing the order of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.2365 of 2022 dated 28.08.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Narayanan For Respondent : Mrs.S.Devasena ORDER (Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan J.) Both the learned Counsel state that to the extent possible, the encroachment has been removed and there is a peepal tree and abutting the peepal tree, on its trunk, a temple had been built. If the temple is to be removed, the tree has to be cut. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CONT P(MD) No. 3084 of 2024 __________ Page2 of 3 2.Necessary steps may be taken by the respondent to atleast reduce the size of the temple without disturbing the tree and reducing the obstruction caused by the existing temple. 3.Recording the same and giving further time to the respondent to do the necessary, the Contempt Petition is closed. Liberty is preserved with the petitioner to file an application to reopen the Contempt Petition, if it is found that still the obstructions have not been removed.
(C.V.K.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 24-07-2026 cmr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CONT P(MD) No. 3084 of 2024 __________ Page3 of 3 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. AND R.SAKTHIVEL, J. cmr CONT.P.(MD)No.3084 of 2024 24-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis