IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.377 of 2024 Decided on: 05.052026 _________________________________________________________________ Satya Prakash Sharma . ....Petitioner Versus Gian Sagar Negi …Respondent _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Janak Raj, Advocate, vice Mr. Harish Chander Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Vijay Singh Thakur, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Sh. Praveen Kumar, Accounts Officer of respondent-H.P. State Co-operative Marketing & Consumer Federation Ltd. has attended the hearing. He has placed on record a flow chart/Statement of Deposits and Calculations. The Officer present with the help of flow chart as also the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - reply filed by the respondent and the supplementary affidavit, has submitted that the judgment rendered in OA No. 2683 of 2015 (Satya Prakash Sharma Vs. The H.P. State Co-operative Marketing and Consumer Federation Limited) decided on 24.09.2018 as also the directions issued in Execution Petition No. 174 of 2020 (Satya Prakash Sharma Vs. The H.P. State Co- operative Marketing and Consumer Federation Limited) decided on 21.12.2023, have been complied with in letter and spirit. The amount due to the petitioner in terms of the aforesaid decisions had been deposited in the Registry of this Court and some of which has been released in favour of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner now submits that in view of flow chart placed on record by the respondent, these proceedings be closed, however, liberty be reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances in accordance with law. 3. Accordingly, taking note of the stand of the parties, in particular the stand of the respondent and the flow chart now placed on record, present proceedings are closed. Notice issued to the respondent is discharged. Petitioner, - 3 - shall however, be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge May 05, 2026 R.Atal