Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 4943 (MAD)

R.Meenal v. V. Swaminathan

REV.APLW(MD)/189/2024 · 2026-07-14

G R Swaminathan

Transfer Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

REV.APLW(MD) No. 189 of 2024 __________ Page1 of 5 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN REV.APLW(MD) No. 189 of 2024 in W.P.(MD)No.25665 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.19237 & 19238 of 2024 R.Meenal W/o.Late.Ramalingam, Keela Vadakkur Village, Angadimangalam Post, Madurai District 625 201 ..Petitioner(s)/LR of the deceased 5th respondent A.Ramalingam Vs 1. V. Swaminathan S/o.Veerapathiran, Keela Vadakkur Village, Angadimangalam Post, Madurai District 625 201. … 1st Respondent / Petitioner 2. The District Collector Collectorate Campus, Madurai. Madurai District 3. The Tahsildar East Taluk, Narasingam, Othakadai, Madurai, Madurai District 4. The Head Surveyor Survey and Land Records Department, East Taluk, Narasingam, Othakadai, Madurai, Madurai District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APLW(MD) No. 189 of 2024 __________ Page2 of 5 5. The Inspector of Police Silaiman Police Station (Wrongly mentioned in the order copy as Seelaiman), Silaiman, Madurai District. … Respondents 2 to 5 / Respondents 1 to 4 6. A.Sundarrajan Keela Vadakkur Village, Angadimangalam Post, Madurai District 625 201 7. R.Soundarajan Keela Vadakkur Village, Angadimangalam Post, Madurai District 625 201 8. P.Balasubramani Keela Vadakkur Village, Angadimangalam Post, Madurai District 625 201. … Respondents 6 to 8/ Respondents 6 to 8 Prayer : Review petition filed under Order 47 rule 1 & 2 r/w. Section 114 CPC, to review the order dated 20.10.2023 passed in WP(MD).No.25665 of 2023 on the file of this Honourable Court and recall the same and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Ms.P.Kalaiyarasi Bharathi For Respondent(s): Mr.Karthik Raja, for M/s.Ajmal Associates for R-1. Mr.P.Rajagopalan, Government Advocate for R-2 to R-4. Mr.I.Murugesan, Government Advocate for R-5. No appearance for R-6 to R-8. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APLW(MD) No. 189 of 2024 __________ Page3 of 5 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the writ petitioner has produced a Demand Draft favouring the review applicant Meenal for a sum of Rs.75,000/-. The same is accepted. 2. In view of the same, this review application stands closed. The rights of the parties will abide by the outcome of the pending civil suit. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 14-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PMU https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APLW(MD) No. 189 of 2024 __________ Page4 of 5 To: 1. The District Collector Collectorate Campus, Madurai. Madurai District 2. The Tahsildar East Taluk, Narasingam, Othakadai, Madurai, Madurai District 3. The Head Surveyor Survey and Land Records Department, East Taluk, Narasingam, Othakadai, Madurai, Madurai District 4. The Inspector of Police Silaiman Police Station(Wrongly mentioned in the order copy as Seelaiman), Silaiman, Madurai District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APLW(MD) No. 189 of 2024 __________ Page5 of 5 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. PMU REV.APLW(MD) No. 189 of 2024 in W.P.(MD)No.25665 of 2023 14-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis