Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 4926 (MAD)

PATEL SETHIYAHOPU CHOLOPURAM HIGHWAY PRIVATE LIMITED, v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER(ST),

WP/7262/2024 · 2026-07-21

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 7262 of 2024 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP Nos. 7262 & 7267 of 2024 & WMP Nos.7262, 8109, 8115 & 8116 of 2024 In both WPs Patel Sethiyahopu Cholopuram Highway Private Limited, Represented By Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Velaga Malikarjunarao, No 223 Kundaveli, NH 45C, Udayarpalayam, Tamil Nadu 612 903. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Assistant Commissioner (ST), Office of the Deputy Commissioner (ST), Kumbakonam Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, 1095, Dr.Moorthy’s Road, Kumbakonam -612 001. 2. Assistant Commissioner (ST), Ariyalur Assessment Circle, CT Building No.5, First Cross Street, Rajaji Nagar Post, Ariyalur 621 704. 3. The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank Pelican Building, Nehru Bridge, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad, Gujarat-380 009. 4. The Project Director National Highways Authority of India, Office of the Project Director, Product Implementation Unit, No.54, Natarajpuram North Colony, Medical College Road, Thanjavur-613 004. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7262 of 2024 __________ Page2 of 6 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER IN W.P.No.7262 of 2026: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records relating to the Impugned Assessment Order bearing reference No. GSTIN 33AAJCP4857G1Z8/2018-19 dated 29.09.2023 along with consequential Form GST DRC-07 bearing reference No. ZD330923242734B dated 29.09.2023 passed by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same. PRAYER IN W.P.No.7267 of 2026: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records relating to the Impugned Assessment Order bearing reference No. GSTIN 33AAJCP4857G1Z8/2019-20 dated 03.10.2023 under section 74 of the TNGST Act along with consequential Form GST DRC-07 bearing reference No. ZD331023008348V passed by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same. In both WPs For Petitioner(s): Mr.Raghavan Rambadaran For Respondent(s): Ms. Amirta Dinakaran Govt. Counsel (Tax) for R1 and R2 No appearance for R3 & R4 COMMON ORDER In these writ petitions, assessment orders relating to assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20 are assailed primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7262 of 2024 __________ Page3 of 6 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of providing copies of electronic invoices, the tax proposal relating to claim of ITC without submission of original invoices was confirmed. He also points out that a sum of Rs.30,26,66,153/- was recovered from the petitioner’s electronic credit ledger. He adds that this amount constitutes more than 50% of the tax demand under the two impugned orders collectively. 3. Ms.Amirta Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel, appears on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. She submits that the orders were issued after considering the petitioner’s reply and the documents submitted by the petitioner. She submits further that non-production of original invoices was not the only basis for confirming tax proposals. 4. The petitioner has produced the electronic credit ledger. This document indicates that recovery of Rs.30,26,66,153/- was made. The total demand towards tax under the two impugned orders collectively is in the region of Rs.50 crores. The amount recovered is in excess of 50% of the tax demand. The petitioner asserts that the tax proposals relating to the four issues captured in the counter affidavit of respondents 1 and 2 were confirmed in spite of the production of relevant documents. In these facts and circumstances, reconsideration is necessary in the interest of justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7262 of 2024 __________ Page4 of 6 5. Therefore, the orders impugned herein are set aside only insofar as they deal with confirmed tax proposal and these matters are remanded for reconsideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, including a personal hearing, fresh orders shall be issued within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 21-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KAL https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7262 of 2024 __________ Page5 of 6 To 1.Assistant Commissioner (ST), Office of the Deputy Commissioner (ST), Kumbakonam Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, 1095, Dr.Moorthy’s Road, Kumbakonam -612 001. 2.Assistant Commissioner (ST), Ariyalur Assessment Circle, CT Building No.5, First Cross Street, Rajaji Nagar Post, Ariyalur 621 704. 3.The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank Pelican Building, Nehru Bridge, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad, Gujarat-380 009. 4. The Project Director National Highways Authority of India, Office of the Project Director, Product Implementation Unit, No.54, Natarajpuram North Colony, Medical College Road, Thanjavur-613 004 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7262 of 2024 __________ Page6 of 6 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KAL WP Nos. 7262 & 7267 of 2024 & WMP Nos.7262, 8109, 8115 & 8116 of 2024 21-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis