Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2024 DAILYLAW 485 (JK)

KRISHNA DEVI AND OTHERS v. MANDEEP KOUR COMMISSIONER SECRETARY HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT AND OTHERS

CCP(S)/194/2024 · 2026-04-18

Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CCP (S) No. 194/2024 in WP (C) No. 56/2024 Krishna Devi and Others .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through :- None v/s Mandeep Kour Commissioner Secretary Housing and Urban Development Deptt. and Others .....Respondent(s) Through :- Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG Mr. Suneel Malhotra, GA CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER 18.04.2026 CCP (S) No. 194/2024 1. By this petition, the petitioners herein have alleged non-compliance of the order passed by this Court in WP (C) No. 56/2024 and CM No. 111/2024 on 12.01.2024 titled “Krishna Devi and Others vs. UT of J&K and Others”. The relevant extract of order dated 12.01.2024 is set out below: - “With the consent of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of, at the threshold, with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner by treating this writ petition as representation and take a decision thereon, strictly under rules and as per law and pass a Sr. No. 14 2 consideration order within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order alongwith complete set of writ petition are made available to the respondents.” 2. Compliance report stands filed by respondent no. 3, wherein it is stated that the claim of the petitioners has been considered vide order dated 04.10.2025 and has been found devoid of any merits, hence rejected. Copy of consideration order is also placed on record. 3. With the passing of consideration order, the Respondents have implemented the order passed by this Court on 12.01.2024 in its letter and spirit. Proceedings in the instant contempt petition are, therefore, closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to challenge consideration order dated 04.10.2025, if they so desire. (Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge JAMMU 18.04.2026 Manik