Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CMP(MD) NOS. 8369, 8370, & 8374 of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14-07-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI CMP(MD) NOS. 8369, 8370, & 8374 of 2024 in SA(MD) NO. 167 of 2008 Palvannan Petitioner(s) in all petitions Vs 1.Narayanan (Died) 2.Kamalam 3.Sermakani (Died) 4.Thangam 5.Annamalaiselvan 6.Paramasivam 7.P.Mugesh Kumar 8.P.Subash Respondent(s) in all petitions For Petitioner(s) in all petitions : Mr.K.Vijayaraghavan, Advocate 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP(MD) NOS. 8369, 8370, & 8374 of 2024 For Respondent(s) in all petitions : Mr.P.Jeyapal, Advocate for R2 Mr.A.George Stephen Kanikkairaj, Advocate for R4 & R5 R6 to R8 – No Appearance Common Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, Order 22 Rule 9(2), Order 22 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to condone the delay of 353 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of 3rd respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of 3rd respondent, to bring on record petitioners 6 to 8 as the legal heirs of the deceased 3rd respondent and rank them as respondents 6 to 8 in the Second Appeal in S.A. (MD)No.167 of 2008 on the file of this Court. COMMON ORDER These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 353 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of 3rd respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of 3rd respondent, to bring on record petitioners 6 to 8 as the legal heirs of the deceased 3rd respondent and rank them as respondents 6 to 8 in the Second Appeal in S.A.(MD)No.167 of 2008 on the file of this Court. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP(MD) NOS. 8369, 8370, & 8374 of 2024
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the common affidavit filed in support of these petitions. 3. The names of respondents 6 to 8 have been printed in the cause list. 4. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and the learned counsel for respondents 4 & 5 have not raised any objections to allow these petitions. 5. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed. 14-07-2026 Note : The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the appeal memorandum. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP(MD) NOS.
8369, 8370, & 8374 of 2024 mkn P.VADAMALAI, J. mkn CMP(MD) NOS. 8369, 8370, & 8374 of 2024 in SA(MD) NO. 167 of 2008 14.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis