Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.22203 of 2024 Page Nos.1/4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 01.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P.No.22203 of 2024 S.Mathuram Selva Raja S/o.Swamidhas ... Petitioner vs. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajan Building No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore, Chennai-600 008. … Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from demolishing the existing compound wall of the petitioner under the guise of widening the road and from disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s property situated at No.83, V.O.C.Main Road, Pavendar Nagar, Kattupakkam, Poonamallee, Chennai-600 056, approved CMDA layout comprised in survey No.97, situated at Kattupakkam Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Chengalpattau District, measuring an extent of 2400 sq.ft. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ramachandran For Respondent : Mr.J.Abdul Kareem for Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali ***** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.22203 of 2024 Page Nos.2/4 O R D E R The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondent from demolishing the existing compound wall in the petitioner’s property under the guise of road widening and from interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property situated at No.83, V.O.C. Main Road, Pavendar Nagar, Kattupakkam, Poonamallee, Chennai – 600 056. 2. According to the petitioner, he is the absolute owner in possession and enjoyment of the said property. It is his apprehension that the respondent may, under the guise of widening the road, demolish the compound wall standing within the property, without following the procedure established by law, thereby infringing his constitutional right guaranteed under Article 300- A of the Constitution of India. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, submits that the apprehension entertained by the petitioner is unfounded and that, as on date, there is no proposal for widening the road. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.22203 of 2024 Page Nos.3/4
4. Be that as it may, if, at any point of time, the respondent proposes to acquire any portion of the petitioner’s property or remove the existing compound wall for the purpose of road widening, the same shall be undertaken only by following the due process of law. Any deprivation of the petitioner’s property otherwise than by authority of law would be contrary to Article 300-A of the Constitution of India. 5.
Recording the aforesaid submission and clarification, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the respondent shall not demolish the compound wall standing in the petitioner’s property except by following the due process of law. No costs. 01.07.2026 Speaking / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mk To The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajan Building No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore, Chennai-600 008. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.22203 of 2024 Page Nos.4/4 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., mk W.P.No.22203 of 2024 01.07.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis