UNION OF INDIA TH MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND OTHERS v. OM PRAKASH
WP(C)/1197/2024 · 2026-03-11
Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 454 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 454 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1197/2024
Union of India & Ors.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Vikas Sharma, Sr. Panel Counsel
vs
Om Prakash
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. B. S. Sarmal, Advocate Mr. S. K. Saini, Advocate Mr. Amit Singh, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 11.03.2026
1.
Learned counsel appearing for Union of India submits that the
judgment passed by the Tribunal, which is impugned in this petition, has been implemented in its letter and spirit and therefore, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Statement, as made hereinabove, is taken on record and accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(Sanjay Parihar) (Sanjeev Kumar)
Judge Judge
Jammu 11.03.2026 Vishal Sharma
Serial No. 10