MRUTYUNJAYA SWAIN v. MANAS RANJAN TRIPATHY, TAHASILDAR,MAHAKALPADA
CONTC/6238/2024 · 2026-04-23
B P Routray
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 448 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 448 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.6238 of 2024
Mrutyunjaya Swain …. Petitioner Mr. A.K.Panda, Advocate
-versus-
Manas Ranjan Tripathy, Tahasildar, Mahakalpada …. Opposite Party Mr. T.K.Dash, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 23.04.2026
Order No.
10.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Dash, learned AGA for the Contemnor.
3. The Tahasildar, Mahakalpada namely, Rabi Narayan Acharya is present in person.
4. It is seen from Annexure-C/1 appended to the reply affidavit of the Tahasildar that the report of the R.I. regarding completion of demarcation was prepared where the brother of the Petitioner namely, Chhotaray Swain has signed. It is further mentioned in the report that the demarcation was conducted in presence of police personnel and village gentries, where the Petitioner was though present but left subsequently. Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 23-Apr-2026 18:51:35 Signature Not Verified
5. Accordingly, it is found that the order of this Court has been complied and the contempt proceeding is dropped. The CONTC is disposed of.
6. However, in view of dispute raised by the Petitioner and as prayed by him, it is left open for the Petitioner to apply for fresh demarcation of the land in question.
7. The personal appearance of the Tahasildar, Mahakalpada is dispensed with.
( B.P. Routray) Judge
S.Das