Serial No.02 REGULAR CAUSE LIST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Bail App 19/2024 CrlM(160/2024) CrlM(885/2024) Faiqa Sajad …Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs. Nadeem Ahmad Ganai Alias Nadeem Nadu and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Zahid Hussain Dar, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER 13.02.2026 1. FIR No. 50/2022 for alleged commission of offences under Sections 376, 384 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code was registered by the Police Station Women’s Rambagh, Srinagar which resulted in the presentation of a Final Police Report (Challan) on 06.02.2023, thereby booking two accused persons, namely Nadeem Ahmad Ganaie Alias Nadeem Nadu and Salman Mansoor Shah and subjecting them to stand trial while in a state of arrest as undertrials. 2. Said two accused persons came to apply for bail individually through the medium of their respective bail applications being BA No. 243/2023 filed on 22.07.2023 on behalf of the respondent No. 1 and BA No. 302/2023 filed on 18.09.2023 on behalf of the respondent No. 2. 3. Said two bail applications came to be disposed of by a common order dated 29.12.2023 passed by the Court of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Srinagar, holding said two accused undertrials entitled to bail. 4. The Court of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Srinagar in passing the order dated 29.12.2023, enlarging two accused persons to bail has dealt with all the attending aspects of the case in the context whereof the matter of grant or non-grant of bail is to be considered. 5. In order to seek cancellation of the bail so granted by the Court of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Srinagar in favour of the two accused, who are respondents No. 1 and 2 herein, the petitioner herein has come forward, being the alleged victim of the crime, with the present petition filed on 17.02.2024. 6. The tone and tenor of the petition seeking cancellation of bail is more with a vengeance mindset rather than serving the ends of justice. Otherwise, the petitioner would not have missed out in coming up with the factual aspects in the light whereof the cancellation of the bail granted in favour of two respondents is being solicited. 7. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant indulgence in the present matter at the instance of the petitioner, whose counsel is also found missing in attending the case, as such, dismissed for non- prosecution. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 13.02.2026 “Mir Arif”