Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2024 DAILYLAW 438 (JK)

UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANR. (HCP Matter) v. PEERZADA MANZOOR AHMAD (HCP Matter)

LPA/328/2024 · 2026-03-09

Shahzad Azeem, Sindhu Sharma

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 10 REGULAR CAUSE LIST HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(7558/2024) IN LPA 328/2024 CM(2995/2025) CM(7559/2024) Union Territory of J&K and Anr. …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy. AG. Vs. Peerzada Manzoor Ahmad. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Asif Nabi, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE. ORDER 09.03.2026 LPA 328/2024; 01. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred against judgment dated 27th March, 2024, whereby the detention order bearing No. DMB/PSA/44 of 2022 dated 16th September, 2022 has been quashed and the respondents/appellants herein were directed to release the petitioner/respondent herein from the preventive detention. 02. The learned counsel for the parties submit that the period of detention in terms of detention order supra, has already expired and, therefore, the present appeal has become infructuous. 03. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the parties, the instant appeal is dismissed along with connected CM(s), as having become infructuous. (SHAHZAD AZEEM) (SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE JUDGE SRINAGAR: 09.03.2026 “HAMID” Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 09.03.2026