W.P.No.1676 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.1676 of 2024 And W.M.P.No.1717 of 2024 Rajamani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai. 2.The Tahsildar, Chengam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District. 3.The Bolck Development Officer, Chengam Bolck Development Office, Thiruvannamalai. 4.The President, Vinnavanur Village, Chengam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District. 5.Murugan 6.Vinnarasu ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 to 4 from 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1676 of 2024 laying the road in the private properties admeasuring 24.5 ares comprised in Sy.No.33/1A, 22.5 ares comprised in Sy.No.33/1B, 25 ares comprised in 33/1C, 17 ares comprised in Sy.No.33/3 and 27 ares comprised in Sy.No.5/1A1 and also the properties admeasuring 2.45 acres comprised in Sy.No.5/1B 90 cents comprised in Sy.No.16/2E, 38 cents comprised in Sy.No.16/2B and 15 cents comprised in Sy.No.9/2B4 situated at Vinnavanur village, Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai district. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajarajan For Respondents : Mr.C.Prabakaran for R1, R2 Government Counsel Mrs.R.Hemavathi for R3, R4 R5, R6 – No Appearance O R D E R The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 to 4 from laying the road in the private properties admeasuring 24.5 ares comprised in Sy.No.33/1A, 22.5 ares comprised in Sy.No.33/1B, 25 ares comprised in 33/1C, 17 ares comprised in Sy.No.33/3 and 27 ares comprised in Sy.No.5/1A1 and also the properties admeasuring 2.45 acres comprised in Sy.No.5/1B 90 cents comprised in Sy.No.16/2E, 38 cents comprised in Sy.No.16/2B and 15 cents comprised in Sy.No.9/2B4 situated at Vinnavanur village, Chengam Taluk, 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1676 of 2024 Tiruvannamalai district. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the subject property and the respondents are taking effective steps to lay road in the petitioner’s property. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the third respondent submitted that steps for laying road in the disputed property was already stopped and the proposal was also cancelled. In future, inorder to avoid confusion, only after consultation with the land owners and revenue officials, such projects will be undertaken. 4.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 12.06.2026 pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1676 of 2024 M.DHANDAPANI,J. pri To 1.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai. 2.The Tahsildar, Chengam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District. 3.The Bolck Development Officer, Chengam Bolck Development Office, Thiruvannamalai. 4.The President, Vinnavanur Village, Chengam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District. W.P.No.1676 of 2024 And W.M.P.No.1717 of 2024 12.06.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis