Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2024 DAILYLAW 416 (HP)

Sudarshan Kumar v. Jai Chand

CMP.M/445/2024 · 2026-04-06

Virender Singh

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sudarshan Kumar versus Jai Chand & Others CMP(M) No. 445 of 2024 in FAO No.146 of 2023 06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Suryabhan Singh, Advocate, for the applicant. Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired. None for respondents No.2 to 9. Appellant Sudarshan Kumar has filed the present application, under Order 39 rules 2A of the CPC with the following prayer:- “ It is therefore, respectfully prayed that this application may kindly be allowed and respondent No.1 may very kindly be prosecuted and punished for knowing and willful disobedience of the orders passed by this court to upkeep the majesty of law in high esteem, in the interest of justice.” Since respondent No.1, has expired, as such, the present application has become infructuous, as the legal representatives cannot be penalized under Order 39 Rule 2-A of the CPC. The application is accordingly disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge April 06, 2026 (ps)