Serial No. 9 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) No. 462/2024 in WP(C) No. 1875/2024 Niyaz Ahmad Buchh and Ors. ….. Appellant/petitioner(s) Through: - None V/S Dr. Bilal Mohi ud Din Bhat and Ors. ….. Respondent(s) Through: - Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, Dy. AG CORAM: HON’BLE MS JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE (ORDER) 24.02.2026 01. Petitioners allege violation of order dated 23.08.2024, passed in WP(C) No. 1875/2024, operative para of the order is taken note of:- “ In the above backdrop, it will be futile to keep this writ petition pending on board and the same is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to respondents to consider and decide the petitioners’ representation for rectification of revenue record within a period of one month from the date copy of this order is order along with writ petition is made available to them.” 02. Statement of facts stands filed by respondents, it is stated that in compliance to order passed by this Court on 23.08.2024, the representation of the petitioners has been considered by the respondents. Paragraphs 3 to 5 of the statement of facts being relevant are taken note of:- 3. That upon examination, the office of the Regional Director, Survey and Land Records, Srinagar, returned the file vide its communication dated 30.07.2024, citing certain technical and procedural Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document observations which required further elaboration, clarification, and ancillary documentation for proper process. 4. That in order to address the observations raised and to ensure that the case is brought to its logical conclusion, this office actively pursued the matter. Keeping in view the nature of observations and to expedite resolution, the answering respondents vide communication No. SDM/SGr/E/PS/24/653-56 dated 10.08.2025, directed the Tehsildar, North Srinagar to clarify the observations raised in the matter. 5. That, accordingly, the case file was resubmitted to the Regional Director, Survey and Land Records, Srinagar vide communication No. SDM/SGR/E/PS/2024/784-87 dated 04.11.2024, after addressing and clarifying all the objections that had earlier been raised for rectification regarding deficit of land measuring 01 Marla 181 Sfts which have been wrongly entered in the name of Mohammad Ashraf during the settlement in the year 2008 in estate Habak Khushi.” 03. Learned counsel for the petitioners has chosen not to appear. It seems that they are satisfied with the statement of facts/compliance, therefore, the contempt proceedings are dropped. However, the petitioners are at liberty to seek revival of the contempt proceedings in case they are not satisfied with the compliance. 04. Disposed of. (MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 24.02.2026 “Mohammad Yasin Dar” Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document