HASEEF PARVEEZ v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. (EXTERNAL / FOREIGN AFFAIRS)
WP(C)/3118/2024 · 2026-02-24
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 414 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 414 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 113 Regular Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 3118/2024 CM(8042/2025) CM(8483/2024) HASEEF PARVEEZ …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. A.M Mir, Advocate Vs.
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. T.M. Shamsi, DSGI with Ms. Rehana Qayoom, Adv
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE.
ORDER 24.02.2026
1. By this petition, petitioner herein is seeking direction upon respondent No. 2 for reissuance of the passport in favor of the petitioner, thereby correcting the date of birth of the petitioner from 07.09.2005 to
07.09.2006.
2. Reply stands filed by respondents, it is stated that as per records of the year 2007, file No. SGRC000032107 was generated on 28th May, 2007, petitioner had submitted Birth Certificate issued by Registrar of Births & Deaths, which reflected the DOB of the petitioner as 07.09.2005. Even the birth certificate issued by the Department of Gynae & Obstetrics, S.K. Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, also reflects the date of birth of the petitioner as 07.09.2005.
3. Accordingly, the passport bearing No. G4042575 dated 30.08.2007, which already stands expired on 29.08.2012, was issued in favour of the petitioner, mentioning his date of birth as 07.09.2005. It is stated that the petitioner again applied for reissuance of passport on 29.12.2017, which too has expired on 29.04.2023.
4. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner, after attaining majority, has again approached respondents for reissuance of the passport, thereby indicating his DOB as 07.09.2006. The petitioner has also placed on record his Matriculation Certificate as well as the rectified certificate by Srinagar Municipal Corporation which he has also placed on record.
5. Be that as it may, respondents are directed to consider the date of birth of the petitioner on the basis of his Matriculation Certificate after due
verification by the Competent Authority within a period of six weeks from the date of passing of this order.
6. Disposed of, along with connected CM(s).
(MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 24.02.2026
“Misba”