Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 4086 (MAD)

N.HARIRAJAN v. S.RAMESH KRISHNAN

AS/296/2024 · 2026-06-08

C V Karthikeyan, K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AS No. 296 of 2024 __________ Page1 of 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR AS No. 296 of 2024 and CMP No. 9573 of 2024 N.Harirajan S/o.Late M.N.Nithiyanandam ..Appellant(s) Vs S.Ramesh Krishnan S/o.Late K.M.Sambasivam ..Respondent(s) Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 and 105(1) of CPC read with Order XLI Rule 1 of CPC to set aside the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.2899 of 2023 dated 21.02.2024 on the file of the XXI Additional City Civil Court, Alikulam, Chennai. For Appellant(s): Mr.S.Janarthanam for Mr.A.V.Arumugam For Respondent(s): Mr.Balamurali of M/s.Shivakumar and Suresh (Law Firm) Judgment (Judgment of the Court was delivered by C.V.Karthikeyan J.) The appellant N.Harirajan and the respondent Mr.S.Ramesh are present in Court. Both the learned counsel also present in Court. The appellant and the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 296 of 2024 __________ Page2 of 9 respondent had entered into a Joint Compromise Memo dated 01.06.2026. The appeal arises from the suit for recovery of money, which had been decreed. Both the parties have entered into a compromise memo which is as follows: https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 296 of 2024 __________ Page3 of 9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 296 of 2024 __________ Page4 of 9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 296 of 2024 __________ Page5 of 9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 296 of 2024 __________ Page6 of 9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 296 of 2024 __________ Page7 of 9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 296 of 2024 __________ Page8 of 9 2. The attention of the Sub-Registrar, Sowcarpet is drawn to Clause 2(G) (n) of Joint Compromise Memo relating to registration of Lease Deed. 3. The appeal stands disposed of in accordance with the above said Joint Compromise Memo. The above joint Compromise Memo shall form part of the decree. In view of the fact that the parties have settled the issue out of Court, the Court fees may be refunded to the appellant in accordance with the Rules. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (C.V.K.,J.) (K.R.S.,J.) 08-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No gpa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 296 of 2024 __________ Page9 of 9 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J. AND K.RAJASEKAR J. gpa AS No. 296 of 2024 and CMP No. 9573 of 2024 08-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis