Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 4060 (MAD)

E. Babu, v. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

REV.APPL/248/2024 · 2026-06-05

Mohammed Shaffiq, S M Subramaniam

Special Leave Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

REV.APPL No. 248 of 2024 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ REV.APPL No. 248 of 2024 E. Babu, Roll No.21PG0902083067, S/o. Mr. D. Embiran, No. 1/20A, 8th Cross Street, Rajendira Nagar, Gingee - 604 202, Villupuram District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Principal Secretary to Government, Department of School Education, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Commissioner/Director School Education Department, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-600 006. 3. The Teachers Recruitment Board Rep. by its Member Secretary, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-600 006. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC r/w Section 114 of CPC to review the judgement passed by the Honourable Division Bench of this Honourable Court in WA.No.217/2024 on 01-04-2024 and pass such further or other orders as this Honourable court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case and thus render justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APPL No. 248 of 2024 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr. K.Thilageswaran For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Kathiravan, Standing Counsel for R3 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The learned counsel for the review petitioner would mainly contend that another Division Bench of the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court has taken a view in favour of the writ petitioner in W.A (MD) No.179 to 184 of 2025 by judgement dated 27.02.2025. However, it is brought to the notice of this Court that a Special Leave Petition in SLP No.71590 of 2025 has been preferred before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and it is pending. Therefore, relying on the above judgement, which is sub-judice before the Apex Court, the present review petition cannot be considered. That apart, the petitioner has not established any error apparent, except producing the judgement, which was subsequently passed by another Division Bench of Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. Any subsequent judgement would not constitute a ground to review the judgement already delivered by this Court. 2. Accordingly, this review application is dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (M.S.Q.,J.) 05-06-2026 Index: Yes Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APPL No. 248 of 2024 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Principal Secretary to Government, Department of School Education, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Commissioner/Director School Education Department, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-600 006. 3. The Teachers Recruitment Board Rep. by its Member Secretary, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-600 006. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APPL No. 248 of 2024 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. RKA REV.APPL No. 248 of 2024 05-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis