Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2024 DAILYLAW 397 (ORI)

CHITTARANJAN CHOUDHURY v. STATE OF ODISHA

CRLMC/3888/2024 · 2026-01-27

S K Panigrahi

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.3888 of 2024 Chittaranjan Choudhury & Ors. …. Petitioner(s) Mr. S.K. Sarangi, Sr. Adv. Mr. A.K. Nayak, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Anr. …. Opposite Party(s) Mr. U.R. Jena, AGA (for O.P. No.1) Mr. Debasnan Das, S.K. Pattnaik, B.B. Sahoo, S. Satapathy, A. Priya, P.K. Shakti Bhusan, A. Singh, Adv (for O.P. No.2) CORAM: DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI Order No. ORDER 27.01.2026 04. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. In filing this CRLMC, the Petitioners have prayed for quashing the cognizance order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Bhubaneswar in C.T. Case No.1117 of 2024, arising out of Bhubaneswar Mahila P.S. Case No.109 of 2024, registered for the offences under Sections 498-A/294/506/34/406 of the I.P.C. and Section 4 of the D.P. Act. Apart from above, the Petitioners have also sought for quashing the charge sheet vide C.S. No.182 dated 06.07.2024. Digitally Signed Signed by: SIPUN BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 28-Jan-2026 19:17:43 Signature Not Verified 3. On perusal of the order dated 30.10.2025, passed in CRLMC No.3888 of 2024, it appears that the matter was referred to the Orissa High Court Mediation Centre for amicable resolution of the dispute with the consent of the learned counsel for both the sides. It further appears that the learned Mediator, vide report dated 07.01.2026, reported that the mediation proceedings were successful. As agreed by both sides, the dispute between the parties has been resolved through compromise subject to the terms and conditions reflected in the application filed under Section 13(B) of Hindu Marriage Act before the learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack. 4. Learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State, on the other hand, submitted that since the matter has been amicably resolved as per the report of the High Court of Orissa Mediation Centre and the parties have agreed to the terms and conditions as contemplated in the petition filed under Section 13(B) of Hindu Marriage Act before the Family Court, Cuttack, he has no objection if this Court passes necessary orders taking into consideration the mutual consent of the parties. 5. Taking into consideration the aforesaid factual background and the fact that the matter has been amicably resolved at the High Court of Orissa Mediation Centre, and further that the parties are agreeable to the terms of compromise as contemplated in the petition filed under Section13(B) of Hindu Marriage Act before the Family Court, Cuttack, this Court has no hesitation in quashing the entire criminal proceeding in C.T. Case No.1117 of 2024, arising out of Bhubaneswar Mahila P.S. Case No.109 of 2024, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Bhubaneswar. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the CRLMC stands disposed of. Both the parties are directed to withdraw the pending cases against each other. This Court hopes and trusts that they shall lead a happy and peaceful life hereinafter. 7. The amount as agreed between the parties before the Mediation Centre shall be deposited by the Petitioner on the date of final hearing before the learned Family Court, Cuttack. 8. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 9. Interim order, if any, passed earlier shall stands vacated. 10. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules. ( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Sipun