UNION OF INDIA TH ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE NEW DELHI AND OTHERS v. JITA RAM
WP(C)/1293/2024 · 2026-02-23
Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 397 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 397 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 1293/2024
UOI an Ors. .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Vikas Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel
v/s Jita Ram .....Respondent(s)
Through :- None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 23.02.2026
None for the parties. Having considered the judgment impugned, in the light of pleadings of the parties before the Tribunal, we find that this case is fully covered by our
judgment dated 13.11.2025 titled “Union of India vs. Nirman Singh Jamwal”, (WP (C) No. 3173/2023 and clubbed matters), wherein, it has been inter alia held that the disability like IHD (ANT MI WALL) is aggravated by the military service. In that view of the matter, the issue raised in this petition is no longer res integra. The writ petition is found devoid of any merit and the same is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Sanjay Parihar)
(Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Judge
JAMMU 23.02.2026 Manik
Sr. No. 30