MEENA THAKUR v. State of H.P through Secretary Urban Development Shimla-2
CWP/9662/2024 · 2026-04-08
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 395 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 395 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.9662 of 2024
Decided on: 8th April, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Meena Thakur
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
In view of the facts, which have already been noticed in the order dated 09.09.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the present writ petition to stand disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua April 08, 2026
Judge Mukesh
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.