BASHIR AHMAD DAR AND ORS. v. PIYUSH SINGLA AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)
CCP(S)/16/2024 · 2026-04-07
M A Chowdhary
Contempt Petitionbody2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 384 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 384 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 16 Regular list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S)/16/2024 BASHIR AHMAD DAR AND ORS. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Prince Hamza, Advocate. Vs.
PIYUSH SINGLA AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Rabinder Singh, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER 07.04.2026
1. Petitioners have moved this contempt petition to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents for having violated the order dated 20.09.2023 passed by this court with the following directions:
“In view of case set up in writ petition and
submissions made by learned senior counsel appearing for petitioners, the instant writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to respondents to consider and decide the representation claimed to have been made by petitioners within two months from the date copy of this order is served upon respondents.”
2. Pursuant to the directions, a compliance report has been filed by the respondents stating therein that in compliance to the aforesaid directions, after thoroughly examining the contents of the court order and going through the representation submitted by the petitioners related to the instant case, the Collector Land Acquisition Budgam
passed/issued consideration Order No. 01 of 2026 dated 05.03.2026, declaring the representation submitted by the applicants/land owners devoid of merit and was accordingly rejected.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners at this stage submits that the petition be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to assail the
consideration order passed by the respondents in separate proceedings.
4. In view of the aforesaid development, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to assail rejection order in appropriate proceedings.
5. Disposed of, accordingly.
;
(MA CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 07.04.2026
“Hilal”