Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2024 DAILYLAW 367 (HP)

Prakash Chauhan v. Bansi Lal Verma

CRMPM/2564/2024 · 2026-03-19

Rakesh Kainthla

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Prakash Chauhan Vs. Bansi Lal Verma Cr. MP(M) No. 2564 of 2024 19.03.2026 Present: None for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Praveen Chauhan, Advocate for the non- applicant/respondent. There was no representation on behalf of the appellant/petitioner on the last date of hearing as well. Today the case has been called repeatedly but the applicant/petitioner is not appearing nor any reasonable cause has been assigned for his non-appearance, which shows that appellant/petitioner is not interested in pursuing the application; therefore, the present application is dismissed in default. Cr. Revision Filing No.1586/2024 Since the application for condonation of delay has been dismissed in default, therefore the present revision is dismissed as having become infructous. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 19th March, 2026 (Nikita)