ANITA SHARMA v. STATE THROUGH NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
CONT.CAS(C)/1144/2024 · 2026-09-02
Mini Pushkarna
Writ Petition (Civil)body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 3618 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 3618 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010430852024 + CONT.CAS(C) 1144/2024 ANITA SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sameer Tayyeb, Mr. Mohd. Salman, Mr. Nazar Hussain, Mr. Ahmad Saeed, Mr. Shahnawaz, Mr. Prateek Pacherwal, Advs. (Through VC) versus STATE THROUGH NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Singh and Ms. Pearl Khurana, Advs. for GNCTD Mob: 9811188892 Mr. Chetanya Singh, Mr. Samarth Tyagi and Ms. Simra Moin, Advs. for MCD Mob: 7503354848 Ms. Parul Agarwal, Adv. for R-2 (Through VC) Mr. Niraj Kumar, Sr. Central Govt. Counsel along with Mr. Chaitanya Kumar, Adv. for R-3/Delhi Police, along with Mr. Satender Kumar Arya, S.I., PS Geeta Colony Mob: 9810020341 Email: advocateniraj2009@gmail.com Mr. Lakshay Teotia , Adv. for owner of property Mr. Udham Singh (Through VC) This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2026 at 14:10:42
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA O R D E R % 02.09.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the
order dated 21st February, 2024, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 2073/2024, whereby, directions had been issued for taking action against the unauthorized construction existing in property bearing no. 29, Sunder Park, Gali No. 2, Shastri Nagar, Geeta Colony, Delhi-110031.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the owner of the property in question submits that his property already stands regularized, and that Regularization Fees has also been duly paid to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”).
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the MCD confirms the said fact that the property in question already stands regularized.
4. He draws the attention of this Court to the Status Report dated 26th March, 2026, filed on behalf of the MCD, wherein, it has been stated as follows:
“xxx xxx xxx This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2026 at 14:10:42
”
5. Considering the aforesaid fact that the property already stands regularized, no directions can be passed in the present petition.
6. However, in case, the petitioner is aggrieved by any order passed by the MCD for regularization of the property in question, the petitioner is at liberty to seek remedies, in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is accordingly
disposed of.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 2, 2026/SK This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2026 at 14:10:42