MEHRAJ UD DIN BHAT AND ANR. v. HILAL AHMAD BHAT AND ANR.
CRM(M)/588/2024 · 2026-03-31
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 361 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 361 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 61 Regular Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) 588/2024 CrlM(1348/2024) MEHRAJ UD DIN BHAT AND ANR. …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs.
HILAL AHMAD BHAT AND ANR.
...Respondent(s) Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE.
ORDER 31.03.2026
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners for the last two hearings. Today also, nobody is present. It appears that the petitioners have lost interest to prosecute this case.
2. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, along with connected CrlMs.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 31.03.2026
“Adil Ismail”