Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2024 DAILYLAW 3578 (DEL)

FRIMLINE PVT. LTD. v. ALNICHE LIFESCIENCES PVT. LTD. & ANR.

CS(COMM)/771/2024 · 2026-08-27

Jyoti Singh

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CS(COMM) 771/2024 $~92 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010591852024 + CS(COMM) 771/2024 & I.As. 38856/2024, 38858/2024 FRIMLINE PVT. LTD. .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Goorge Vithayathil and Ms. Nandini Choudhary, Advocates. versus ALNICHE LIFESCIENCES PVT. LTD. & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Arpit Bhargava, Mr. Sarthak Sharma, Ms Hina Bhargava and Ms. Amrita Dhawan, Advocates for D-1. Mr. K. Krishna Kumar, Advocate for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 31.08.2026 1. Matter is taken up today as 27.08.2026 was declared holiday vide Notification No.85/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 21.08.2026. 2. This suit is filed by the Plaintiff inter alia seeking permanent injunction restraining the Defendants and all others acting on their behalf from infringing the suit patent No. IN’547960. 3. During the pendency of the suit, Plaintiff and Defendant No. 1 have amicably resolved their inter se disputes and terms of the settlement are incorporated in the Settlement Agreement dated 13.04.2026, executed before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, copy of which is on record. Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/09/2026 at 10:48:21 CS(COMM) 771/2024 be lawful. 4. Insofar as Defendant No. 2 is concerned, an affidavit dated 18.05.2026 has been filed acknowledging the validity of the Patent IN’547960 and undertaking inter alia not to use in any manner the product under the mark PALMOVA and/or any other product with identical composition as claimed in the patent, till its expiry. 5. Accordingly, the suit is decreed in favour of the Plaintiff and against Defendant No. 1 in terms of the settlement as also against Defendant No. 2 in terms of the undertaking given by the said Defendant. Needless to state that rights of Defendant No. 2 under Section 107A of the Patents Act, 1970 shall remain preserved subject to conditions mentioned therein. 6. Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 7. Suit along with pending applications stands disposed of. 8. Plaintiff is held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with Court Fees Act, 1870. JYOTI SINGH, J AUGUST 31, 2026/VP This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/09/2026 at 10:48:21