NUZHAT SIDIQ v. TARIQ HUSSAIN GANAI AND ANR. (ESTATES)
CCP(S)/479/2024 · 2026-04-01
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
Contempt Petitionbody2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 351 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 351 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 29 Regular Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 479/2024 in[OWP 144/2017] NUZHAT SIDIQ …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Nisar Ahmad Bhat, Advocate Vs.
TARIQ HUSSAIN GANAI AND ANR. (ESTATES)
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ilyas Nazir, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE.
ORDER 01.04.2026
1. By this petition, petitioner herein has alleged non-compliance of the order passed by this court dated 21.08.2024, relevant paragraph of which is taken note of herein:
“10. In the above backdrop, I find that the petitioner is entitled to rent as fixed by respondent department with respect to her residential house. Therefore this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent-department to ensure payment of rent to the petitioner for the period she has not been paid on account of retention of her house by Shri Chowdhary Mohammad Ramzan, within a period of two months from the date copy of this order is served upon them.”
2. Compliance report stands filed by the respondents, it is stated that as per the rent calculation, the house of the petitioner was hired by the Deputy Director Estates, Kashmir from 01.01.2018 to 31.10.2020 (i.e., 34 months) @ Rs. 43,000/- per month. An amount of Rs. 14,62,000/- has thus been paid to the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents states that the order passed by this court dated 21.08.2024 has been implemented in its letter and spirit.
4. In view of the above, contempt proceedings stand closed.
5. Contempt petition is disposed of.
(MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 01.04.2026
“Misba”