Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 3456 (MAD)

RAVIKUMAR v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/34941/2024 · 2026-04-06

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 34941 of 2024 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 34941 of 2024 Ravikumar S/o Govindasamy Gounder, Kattukottai, Kaniyamoor Village, Kallakurichi Taluk And District ..Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Office Of District Collector , Kallakurichi. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi. 3. The Thasildhar, Offie Of Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi, 4. The Special Thasildar (Railways) Office Of Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi. 5. The Block Development Officer, Office Of Block Development Officer, Chinnasalem, Kallakurichi District, ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of Indis seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from laying road on the petitioner’s patta land comprised in SF.No 56/5 and 56/8 at Kaniyamoor village, Chinnasalem Taluk, Kallakurichi by considering the representation of the petitioner herein dated 16.11.2024. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 34941 of 2024 __________ Page2 of 5 For Petitioner: Mr.R.Nalliyappan For Respondents: Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed praying to forbear the respondents from laying road on the petitioner’s patta land comprised in S.F.No 56/5 and 56/8 at Kaniyamoor village, Chinnasalem Taluk, Kallakurichi by considering the representation of the petitioner herein dated 16.11.2024. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the respondents herein are taking hectic steps to lay tar road on the petitioner’s patta land, the petitioner herein made a detailed representation to the respondents on 16.11.2024 by making his objection to lay road on the petitioner’s patta land. 3. In reply, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation dated 16.11.2024 will be disposed of by the respondent within a period of two weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent and also perused the materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 34941 of 2024 __________ Page3 of 5 5. In view of the above, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 16.11.2024 on its own merits and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner and the persons concerned. . 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 06-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No arr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 34941 of 2024 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The District Collector Office Of District Collector , Kallakurichi. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Office Fo Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi 3. The Thasildhar Offie Of Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi 4. The Special Thasildar (railways) Office Of Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi 5. The Block Development Officer Office Of Block Development Officer, Chinnasalem, Kallakurichi District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 34941 of 2024 __________ Page5 of 5 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. arr WP No. 34941 of 2024 06-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 34941 of 2024 __________ Page6 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis