IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (260) 1. LPA-3280-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 Municipal Corporation Faridabad --Appellant Versus Ram Kesh & Ors. --Respondents 2. LPA-997-2025 (O&M) Municipal Corporation Faridabad --Appellant Versus Ved Pal --Respondent 3. LPA-1075-2025 (O&M) Ramesh & Ors. --Appellants Versus State of Haryana & Anr. --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MINDERJEET YADAV. Present:- Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate for the appellant(s). Ms. Malvika Chauhan, Advocate for the respondent in LPA-997-2025. Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate for the appellants in LPA-1075-2025. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI .J (Oral) CM-2650-LPA-2025 in LPA-1075-2025 This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 40 days that has occurred in filing the accompanying appeal. LUCKY 2026.09.07 12:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement High Court chandigarh LPA-3280-2024 (O&M) & connected appeals -2- In view of the averments made in the application supported by way of an affidavit, same is allowed. Delay of 40 days in filing the appeal is condoned. CM-2461-LPA-2025 in LPA-997-2025 This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 66 days that has occurred in filing the accompanying appeal. In view of the averments made in the application supported by way of an affidavit, same is allowed. Delay of 66 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Main Appeals 1. In the present bunch of appeals being identical in nature, the challenge is to the impugned order dated 04.08.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP-1653-2017 titled as Ramkesh Vs. Municipal Corporation, Faridabad and connected cases. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the issue raised in the present appeals has already been decided by the Coordinate Bench of this Court while deciding LPA No.1810 of 2025 titled as Aas Mohammad and others Vs State of Haryana & others, on 23.04.2026 and hence the present bunch of appeals be also disposed of in the same terms. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) raises no objection. 3. Ordered accordingly. 5. Civil Misc. application(s) pending, if any, shall also stand disposed of. 6. A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected files. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 03.09.2026 (MINDERJEET YADAV) lucky JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether Reportable: No LUCKY 2026.09.07 12:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement High Court chandigarh