Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 3356 (MAD)

CHANDRASEKAR v. T.C.UMASHANKAR

CMP/29791/2024 · 2026-03-27

S Sounthar

Transfer Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP No. 29791 of 2024 in Sa Sr.No.154787 of 2024 SIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CMP No. 29791 of 2024 in SA Sr No.154787 of 2024 Chandrasekar S/o. Ranganath Reddiar, Kothiambakkam, Vellavedu Post, Thirunindravur Firka, Poonamallee, Rep by his Power of Attorney Agent, Mr.R.Gopikrishnan S/o. Raghava Reddiar, No. 37/31, Vellala Street, Kodambakkam, Chennai 024 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. T.C.Umashankar S/o. P.Chelvaraj Mudaliar No.10, Angadi Street, Ayanavaram, Chennai 023 2. Angammal W/o. Manickkam, Kothiambakkam Village, Vellavedu Post, Poonamallee Taluk 3. Raghava Reddy S/o. Venkataswamy Reddy, Proprietor of Rajeshwari Brick Works, Kothiambakkam Village, Vellavedu Post, Poonamallee Taluk 4. Rajeswari W/o. Raghava Reddy, Kothiambakkam Village, Vellavedu Post, Poonamallee Taluk 5. M/s.Lakshmi Brick Industries Rep by its Sole Proprietor Kothiambakkam Village, Vellavedu Post, Poonamallee Taluk 6. Megavannan S/o. Purushothama Pillai Varadharajapuram Village, Nazarathpet Post, Chennai 123 __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 29791 of 2024 in Sa Sr.No.154787 of 2024 7. Veeraraghavan S/o. Purushothama Pillai Varadharajapuram Village, Nazarathpet Post, Chennai 123 8. Balu S/o. Purushothama Pillai Varadharajapuram Village, Nazarathpet Post, Chennai 123 9. Avandhiammal D/o. Purushothama Pillai Varadharajapuram Village, Nazarathpet Post, Chennai 123 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of 908 days in filing the Second Appeal as against the Judgment and Decree dated 31.01.2020 in A.S.No. 47 of 2016 on the file Honble Subordinate Court at Poonamalle. For Appellant(s): Ms. C.Harini for Mr. M.V.Seshachari For Respondent(s): Mr.G.Jehanathan For R1 ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant/first defendant submits that the second appeal is arising out of decree for declaration of title obtained by the first respondent/ sole plaintiff. The respondents 2 to 9, who are the co-defendants are not necessary parties. The learned counsel also made an endorsement in the bundle, giving up the respondents 2 to 9. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 29791 of 2024 in Sa Sr.No.154787 of 2024 2. The submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is recorded. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the first respondent. 4. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay of 908 days in filing the second appeal is condoned on condition that the petitioner/appellant makes a payment of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees one Thousand only) to the credit of 'Chief Justice Relief Fund, Madras High Court', within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order, failing which, the condone delay petition in C.M.P.No.29791 of 2024 shall stand automatically dismissed. 5. In case of payment of costs within the stipulated time, the C.M.P.No.29791 of 2024 shall stand allowed and the Registry is directed to number the second appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission. 27-03-2026 MST __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 29791 of 2024 in Sa Sr.No.154787 of 2024 S.SOUNTHAR, J. MST CMP No. 29791 of 2024 in SA Sr No.154787 of 2024 27-03-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis