CWP-10429 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 214 Surender Kumar State of Haryana and others CORAM:- Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. ( dated 21.03 09.02.2024 ( contractual service for the post of Data Entry Operator on poor performance, whereas no notice was ever given to the petitione such poor performance in duties; further for quashing the impugned order dated another set of contractual employee being voilative of settled princip of law and without obtaining the sancti the year 2024; further for quashing the respondent for levelling false experience certificate, as the same was issued by the respondent No.4, and all the the respondent authorities because the petitioner is working and remained posted with the office of respondent No.4 10429-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of der Kumar Versus State of Haryana and others - HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Suvir Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Chirag Wadhwa, DAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA J. (ORAL) Prayer in this writ petition is for 03.2024 (Annexure P-15) rejecting the representation dated 2024 (Annexure P-14) for grant of sanction for extension of contractual service for the post of Data Entry Operator on poor performance, whereas no notice was ever given to the petitione such poor performance in duties; further for quashing the impugned order dated 27.02.2024 (Annexure P-16), replacing the petitioner with another set of contractual employee being voilative of settled princip of law and without obtaining the sanction for contractual the year 2024; further for quashing the respondent for levelling false allegation for obtaining the bogus experience certificate, as the same was issued by the respondent No.4, and all the experience certificates have been issued to the petitioner by the respondent authorities because the petitioner is working and remained posted with the office of respondent No.4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10429-2024 Date of Decision: 10.09.2026 ….. Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Suvir Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Chirag Wadhwa, DAG, Haryana. Prayer in this writ petition is for quashing impugned order 15) rejecting the representation dated 14) for grant of sanction for extension of contractual service for the post of Data Entry Operator on the ground of poor performance, whereas no notice was ever given to the petitioner for such poor performance in duties; further for quashing the impugned 16), replacing the petitioner with another set of contractual employee being voilative of settled principles on for contractual employment for the year 2024; further for quashing the impugned action of the allegation for obtaining the bogus experience certificate, as the same was issued by the respondent No.4, certificates have been issued to the petitioner by the respondent authorities because the petitioner is working and remained posted with the office of respondent No.4 since 2011; RISHU KATARIA 2026.09.11 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgmdent. CWP-10429 AND/OR (AnnexureP Agreement/Contract in case of the petitioner has not been granted by the respondent authorities while granted in case of juniors to the petitioner as per the mentioned therein; and for quashing the impugned Order dated 28.12.2023 (Annexure P service, without assigning any reasons and being in and conditions of the Service discriminatory while granting the extension of contract of service up to 31.12.2024 to the juniors to the petitioner, as well as being voilative of settled principal of law to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate law including Arbitration as provided in the Service/Contract Agreement dated 01.01.2021 (Annexure P 10.09.2026 rishu 10429-2024 further for quashing the impugned order dated 21 P-12), to the extent that the sanction for renewal of Service Agreement/Contract in case of the petitioner has not been granted by the respondent authorities while granted in case of juniors to the petitioner as per the mentioned therein; and for quashing the impugned Order dated 2023 (Annexure P-13), whereby, the petitioner is relieved from service, without assigning any reasons and being in and conditions of the Service Agreement/Contract and being discriminatory while granting the extension of contract of service up to 2024 to the juniors to the petitioner, as well as being voilative of settled principal of law “first-come last go After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate law including Arbitration as provided in the Service/Contract Agreement 01.01.2021 (Annexure P-9), if any. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall .09.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: urther for quashing the impugned order dated 21.12.2023 12), to the extent that the sanction for renewal of Service Agreement/Contract in case of the petitioner has not been sought and granted by the respondent authorities while seeking such sanction and granted in case of juniors to the petitioner as per the date of appointment mentioned therein; and for quashing the impugned Order dated 13), whereby, the petitioner is relieved from service, without assigning any reasons and being in violation of the terms Agreement/Contract and being discriminatory while granting the extension of contract of service up to 2024 to the juniors to the petitioner, as well as being voilative of come last go”. After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate remedy in accordance with law including Arbitration as provided in the Service/Contract Agreement with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE : Yes / No Yes / No RISHU KATARIA 2026.09.11 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgmdent.