$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 83/2024 KUNTALA MALLICK .....Appellant Through: Appellant through Video Conferencing. versus SHALINI GARG .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 22.07.2026 CM APPL. 46068/2026 (under Order XXIII Rule 1 read with Section 197 and Section 151 CPC on behalf of the Appellant for Withdrawal of the present Appeal) 1. An Application has been filed on behalf of the Appellant for withdrawal of the present Appeal. 2. The Appellant has appeared through Video Conferencing and submits that the case was dismissed. She is in Orissa and does not want to pursue the present Appeal. 3. In view of the statement made by the Appellant, she is permitted to withdraw the present Appeal. 4. The Application is allowed and stands disposed of accordingly. RFA 83/2024 5. In view of the observations made in the CM APPL.46068/2026, the present Appeal stands disposed of along with the pending Application(s). This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 12:25:03 6. The next date of 10.09.2026 stands cancelled. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J JULY 22, 2026/va This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 12:25:03