Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 3221 (MAD)

S.DEVARAJAN v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/20161/2024 · 2026-03-26

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 20161 of 2024 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 20161 of 2024 1. S.Devarajan 2. M.Dayalan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Chennai. 2. Tahsildar Thiruvottiyur, 3. The Assistant Engineer(PWD), Cholavaram Irrigation Wing, Sengundram, Chennai-52 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to pay compensation as per the Land Acquisition Act 2013 to the petitioners in respect of survey numbers (333/4A4A-22.84ares, 4A4B(pt)-7.12ares, 4A3A(pt)-9.26 ares, 4A1A(pt)-4.96ares, 4A1B(pt)-3.10 ares)Total extent -47.29 ares bearing patta no.2180 situated at Sadaiyankuppam Revenue village, Thiruvottiyur Taluk, Chennai District in the light of the letter issued by the 2nd and 3rd respondents dated 06.10.2022 by considering the representation of the petitioners dated 13.06.2024. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20161 of 2024 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr. G. Thyagarajan For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Gauthamaraj Government Advocate ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 13.06.2024. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner has given a representation dated 13.06.2024 for payment of compensation to the petitioner’s land which was taken by the respondents for improvement and raising of bund on the Kosathalai River. Since no order was passed, the petitioner filed this writ petition. 3. In reply, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner’s representation dated 13.06.2024 will be disposed of by the 3rd respondent within a period of twelve weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents and also perused the materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20161 of 2024 __________ Page3 of 4 5. In view of the above, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 13.06.2024 on its own merits and pass appropriate orders on the same, in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitoiner. 6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 26-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KKN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20161 of 2024 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. KKN WP No. 20161 of 2024 26-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis