Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(262)
CRM-M-59688-2024 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 02.09.2026
Nishu Gupta
…. PETITIONER V/S State of Punjab
…. RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr.Ritu Raj Singh, AAG, Punjab.
**** RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned State counsel makes a statement at Bar that after passing of the impugned order Annexure P-1 dated 07.08.2024, much water has flown and charges have been framed, whereafter, evidence of 4 witnesses has been recorded and 2 witnesses mentioned in the list of witnesses have been given up.
2.
In view of his such statement and considering the fact that there was no stay operating coupled with the fact that no one has appeared for the petitioner today, the present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Interim application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed off.
(RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI)
JUDGE 02.09.2026
sailesh
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable
: Yes/No SAILESH RANJAN 2026.09.02 19:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document bottom left