Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 3197 (PNJ)

PAWAN KUMAR ANCHAL v. RANDHIR AND OTHERS

CR/3321/2024 · 2026-08-27

Subhas Mehla

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

258 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3321-2024 (O & M) Date of decision: 27.08.2026 PAWAN KUMAR ANCHAL ...PETITIONER V/S RANDHIR AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Man Mohan, Advocate for respondent No.1. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL) 1. The matter is taken up out of turn as on mentioning, learned counsel for respondent No.1 has submitted that respondent No.1, who is plaintiff before the trial Court has withdrawn his suit and the present petition has become infructuous. 2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner and perusal of the order dated 20.02.2026 shows that no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on that date also. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No.1, the present revision petition stands disposed of as having been rendered as infructuous. MANISHA 2026.08.31 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-3321-2024 (O & M) -2- 4. It is made clear that the petitioner would be at liberty to revive the present revision petition if any cause of action still survives. 5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (SUBHAS MEHLA) August 27, 2026 JUDGE Manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.08.31 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document