HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4020 of 2024 Court No. - 45 HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Sri Shiv Kumar Kesari learned counsel for the revisionist submits that, in view of the subsequent developments, the present petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission, nothing survives for consideration in the present petition. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 9, 2026 Akram Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Shiv Kumar Kesari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Deelip Kumar Pathak, G.A., Rajeev Giri (Padam Narain Mishra,J.) Saleem Khan @ Chunnu .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKRAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad