Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2024 DAILYLAW 3189 (DEL)

NITIN SURENDER KUMAR BHARDWAJ v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

W.P.(CRL)/3193/2024 · 2026-07-07

Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~65& 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 65 + W.P.(CRL) 3193/2024 NITIN SURENDER KUMAR BHARDWAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Utsav Jain and Mr. Manish Bhojwani, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi ASC with Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Advocates. Mr. Sumit Sahni, Mr. Himanshu, Mr. Gurender Rana, Mr. Pritam Singh, Mr. Jeetu, Mr. Nishu Chaudhary, Ms. Swati Puri, Advocates for R-2. Mr Rachit Bigghe, Advcoate for ICICI Bank. Mr. Santosh kumar Rout, Advocate for SBI. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj CGSC, Mr. Kushagra Kumar, Mr. Amit Kumar Rana, Advcoates. 66 + W.P.(CRL) 3454/2025, CRL.M.A. 31431/2025, CRL.M.A. 31432/2025 LAKSHAY SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Utsav Jain and Mr. Manish Bhojwani, Advocates. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/07/2026 at 11:54:45 versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amol Sinha (ASC criminal for state) with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mr. Nitish Dhawan, Advocates. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 07.07.2026 1. The sole grievance raised by the petitioners is with respect to not affording opportunity of hearing by the concerned Magistrate while passing orders dated 03.08.2024 impugned in W.P.(CRL) 3193/2024 and 25.04.2025 in W.P.(CRL) 3454/2025, respectively. The said submission raised by the petitioners seems to be correct as the petitioners were not heard. The amount from the petitioners’ account was directed to be transferred to the complainant’s account. This order could not have been passed without affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the matters are remitted back to the concerned Magistrate who shall hear the petitioners and to pass fresh orders. The petitioners, thereafter, if have any grievance shall be at liberty to take appropriate remedy. 3. The remittance of the amount back to the petitioners’ account shall depend upon the further orders to be passed by the concerned Magistrate. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/07/2026 at 11:54:45 4. With respect to any other grievance, the petitioners shall be at liberty to take appropriate remedy including to file fresh petitions. 5. The petitions stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Pending applications also stand disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JULY 7, 2026 tr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/07/2026 at 11:54:45