HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 16380 of 2024 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Instant writ petition has been listed under the heading of "Likely to be Infructuous" cases. 2. However, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to point out the survival of the instant writ petition. Therefore, the instant writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. It is clarified that if the cause of action still survives to maintain the instant writ petition, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application within limitation against the order of the date. September 10, 2026 VR Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avesh Mishra, Paritosh Sukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Birendra Pratap Yadav, Vinod Kumar Yadav (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Islamuddin @ Banne .....Petitioner(s) Salahuddin .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad