Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 3166 (PNJ)

DHARAMPAL AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/27239/2026 · 2026-08-26

Aman Chaudhary

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 114 DHARAMPAL AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. the present petition, a representat been submitted to the respondents, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to to decide the same and others, 2024 SCC Online SC 3826 2. limited prayer made. 3. merits of the case, this petition is hereby dispo the respondents to decide the expeditiously judgment and granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-27239 Date of decision DHARAMPAL AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Rishab Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Rahul Mohan, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that regarding the claim raised in the present petition, a representation dated 09.02.2026, Annexure P been submitted to the respondents, which has yet not evoked any He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to to decide the same in light of the judgment in , 2024 SCC Online SC 3826, in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the respondents have limited prayer made. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby dispo the respondents to decide the representation dated 09.02.2026 expeditiously, in accordance with law, taking note of the aforesaid and granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 27239-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 26.08.2026 ....Petitioners ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Haryana. Mr. Rahul Mohan, Advocate for submits that regarding the claim raised in 09.02.2026, Annexure P-3, has been submitted to the respondents, which has yet not evoked any He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to them judgment in Jaggo vs. Union of India a time bound manner. counsel for the respondents have no objection to the In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to representation dated 09.02.2026, , taking note of the aforesaid and granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, which PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.08.26 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-27239-2026 -2- this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 4. Upon doing so, if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 26.08.2026 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.08.26 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document