Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-26682
IN THE HIG
112
Anil Kumar
State of Hary
CORAM: H
Present: -
NIDHI GUP
1.
Constitution directing the of judgment 2024 titled dated 30.01. and others: him all cons in terms of passed in CW dated 12.05. Singh and o has been ma regular emp ‘Equal Pay consequentia 6682-2026
-1-
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA
CWP Date o
umar
Versus
f Haryana and others
M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
Mr. Vicky Chauhan, Advocate f
I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this writ petition filed itution of India is for issuance of a wr ng the respondents to regularize the se gments of the Hon’ble Apex Court i titled as Bhola Nath Versus The S 30.01.2026 (Annexure P-4) and (ii) ers: 2024 SCC Online SC 3826 (A l consequential benefits i.e. seniority, ms of judgments of this Court dated CWP-31304-2025 titled as Jogind 12.05.2026 (Annexure P-6) in CWP nd others vs. State of Haryana and en made to grant pays scale and allow r employees of the respondent-Dep l Pay for Equal Work’ from the date uential benefits along with interest @
D HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26682-2026 Date of Decision: 21.08.2026
.… Petitioner
.... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ocate for the petitioner. n filed under Articles 226/227 of the f a writ in the nature of Mandamus the service of the petitioner in view ourt in (i) SLP (C) No. 30762 of e State of Jharkhand & others Jaggo Versus Union of India (Annexure P-2); and also grant ority, pay fixation, arrears of salary; dated 31.12.2025 (Annexure P-5) ginder vs. State of Haryana; and WP-1770-2026, titled as Deepak and others; AND further prayer allowances which are being paid to Department on the principle of date of his joining and all other rest @ 9% per annum. f the
iew of
ia rant lary; 5) and ak ayer id to e of ther RISHU KATARIA 2026.08.24 13:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgmdent.
CWP-26682
2.
that the peti cum-Telepho Since, then t direct superv break. Acco service. Lea regularizatio Apex Court Deepak Sing
3.
would be sa with a direct petitioner fo down by the Court in Jog P-6, respecti
4.
5. of responden prayer made It is also su ascertained service to ma
7.
commenting 6682-2026
-2-
It is inter alia submitted by lear e petitioner had joined the responde elephone Operator at Haryana Bhawa then the petitioner is continuously dis supervision and control of the respon Accordingly, the petitioner has ren
Learned counsel submits that rization is fully covered by the ratio Court in Jaggo’s case (supra) as also Singh Cases (supra) (Annexure P-
Learned counsel for the petition be satisfied at this stage if the presen direction to the respondents to consid ner for regularization in a time bound the Hon’ble Apex Court in Jaggo’ Joginder and Deepak Singh Case spectively). Notice of motion. Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Hary pondent-State and submits that he ha made by learned counsel for the petiti lso submitted that the service tenure ained as to whether he has rendered e to make him eligible for regularizatio
After hearing learned counsel enting upon the merits of the pre
by learned counsel for the petitioner pondent-Department as Reception- Bhawan, New Delhi on 10.09.2022. sly discharging his duties under the respondent-Department without any as rendered more than 10 years of that claim of the petitioner for e ratio of judgment of the Hon’ble s also of this Court in Joginder and -5 and P-6, respectively). etitioner submits that the petitioner present writ petition is disposed of consider and decide the claim of the ound manner, in view of law laid ggo’s case (supra) as also by this Cases (supra) (Annexure P-5 and , Haryana, accepts notice on behalf he has ‘no objection’ in case, the e petitioner at this stage, is accepted. tenure of the petitioner needs to be ndered continuous and satisfactory rization. unsel for the parties and without e present petition, the same is
022. r the any s of for ’ble and oner d of f the laid this and half the
o be tory RISHU KATARIA 2026.08.24 13:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgmdent.
CWP-26682
disposed of concerned, t for regulari accordance receipt of
judgment pa and by this (Annexure P
8.
21.08.2026 rishu
6682-2026
-3-
ed of with a direction to the respon , to forthwith consider and decide gularization by passing a speaking ance with law, within a period of a certified copy of this order, passed by the Hon’ble Apex Cou y this Court in Joginder and Dee xure P-5 and P-6, respectively).
Pending application, if any, also 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
respondents/Competent Authority, decide the claim of the petitioner eaking and reasoned order, in d of 06 months from the date of , while keeping in mind the Court in Jaggo’s case (supra) Deepak Singh Cases (supra) also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No
Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2026.08.24 13:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgmdent.