IN T 116 Rajesh Ku State of Ha CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU in the natu 27.11.2024 of a writ in the petition and extend Haryana Co 06.12.2024 the operatio during the p the petition Bench of th CWP-26717 of 2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR CWP No.26717 o Date of decision : sh Kumar and others Versus Haryana and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NID Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Harya I GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present writ petit e nature of Certiorari for quashing .2024 (Annexure P-13) issued by the re rit in the nature of Mandamus directi etitioners to continue under the Harya xtend to them the protection available ana Contractual Employees (Security o .2024 (Annexure P-12). A further praye peration of the impugned letter dated 2 g the pendency of the present writ petiti Learned counsel for the petition etitioners is covered by the judgment h of this Court in Balkar Nain and o 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 6717 of 2026 (O & M) ision :-21.08.2026 …..Petitioners …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA cate , Haryana. it petition is for issuance of a writ shing the impugned order dated the respondents; and for issuance directing the respondents to permit Haryana Kaushal Rozgar Nigam ailable under the provisions of the urity of Service) Act, 2024, dated r prayer has been made for staying ated 27.11.2024 (Annexure P-13) it petition. petitioners submits that the case of gment rendered by a Co-ordinate nd others vs. State of Haryana VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.21 16.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document and others of 2024 and present wr respondents judgment r manner. of responde direction is in a time bo the petition the respond judgment r law, within copy of this August 21 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep CWP-26717 of 2026 (O & M) hers, decided on 08.04.2026 (Annexu 24 and other connected writ petitions. nt writ petition may be disposed o ndents to consider the case of the pe ent rendered in Balkar Nain’s case Heard. Notice of motion. Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Hary spondent-State and submits that he ha tion is issued to the respondents to deci ime bound manner. In view of the aforesaid prayer etitioners, the present writ petition is disp espondents to consider the case of the p ent rendered in Balkar Nain’s case within a period of six months from the of this order. Pending application(s), if any, sh 1, 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 2 nnexure P-18), in CWP No.34783 itions. He further submits that the sed of with a direction to the the petitioners in the light of the s case (supra), in a time bound , Haryana accepts notice on behalf he has no objection in case the to decide the case of the petitioner rayer made by learned counsel for disposed of with a direction to f the petitioners in the light of the case (supra), in accordance with m the date of receipt of a certified any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.21 16.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document